Friday, August 11, 2006
RM
Saturday, August 12, 2006 1:30:50 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback

If you ever wondered how much our current diplomatic effort regarding the fighting in Lebanon has helped change the Middle East, you only need to look at what is becoming the most popular name for newborns in Egypt: Nasrallah.

RM
Friday, August 11, 2006 9:40:50 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback

I think its clear from this quote from an unnamed Bush Administration official, that the Bush people place a higher premium on one of the two and it ain't Fighting Terrorism.  After the Lieberman/Cheney quote yesterday I was trying to find the recent report about a bipartisan majority of American foreign policy experts who think we're losing the "War on Terror" and here it is... not pretty.  Remember that when you see the odd phenomenon of struggling Republican candidates around the country suddenly endorsing Joe Lieberman's independent run or Administration officials timing terror alerts to change the news cycle for partisan purposes.  Better yet, since the President's poll numbers dropped one more time and Republican candidates around the country don't want him around , I'm guessing you'll probably see more terror alerts and talk about terrorism in the next couple months because frankly the Republican Party doesn't have anything to run on and scaring people seemed to work the last two election cycles so why not bring it out again.

RM
Friday, August 11, 2006 6:32:57 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, August 10, 2006

Ah yes, Joe Lieberman, Man of Principle?  Perhaps someone would stop long enough to ask Lieberman (I-Washington Media establishment) what exactly he's done or proposes to do that effectively, yes I said effectively, fights terrorism and makes this country truly safer in the long run, cause I gotta tell ya the policies he's supporting aren't working.

RM
Friday, August 11, 2006 1:35:27 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [6]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, August 09, 2006

I think Simon Rosenberg offers a pretty compelling list of 3 things Joe Lieberman did wrong over the last year that pretty much cost him the Democratic nomination last night and oddly enough none of them have anything to do with the power of the "netroots" or the blight of "blogofacism".

RM
Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:29:23 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback

John Aravosis at AmericaBlog takes a pin and punctures the latest Republican meme that Ned Lamont's victory means a takeover of the Democratic party by the loony liberal left-wing of the Party (whatever that is...) by pointing out that if we are to believe that then certainly someone as left and conspiracy minded as incumbent Cynthia McKinney should have won her run-off election going away.  The fact that she lost badly and the DCCC left little doubt it wanted her gone among other fine examples kinda muddies what you're going to hear every RNC and Republican elected official, as well as the mainstream and conservative media establishment, whip like a dead horse for the next two months, but keep it in mind nonetheless. 

RM
Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:03:59 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

The Democratic Party has lost its SOULLLLLLL!

Joe, who? Nothing to see here, move along....

Okay, we're talking about a relatively unknown moderate Republican from Michigan and a former Democratic Vice-Presidential candidate who gets more Sunday morning face time than the leadership of his own Party ( which now I guess is truly "his own" Party) but pretty much the same story: two incumbent politicians out of step with their constituents and Party who get booted.  Ned Lamont doesn't have to apologize for knocking off Joe Lieberman any more than Al D'Amato did for ending Jacob Javits career or Lloyd Bentsen did for ending Ralph Yarborough's career...yes, this sort of thing has happened before even the "netroots" and somehow the Republic, as well as the Republican and Democratic Parties, did survive.

(Updated 8/9/06:12:21pm)

RM
Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:53:06 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, August 08, 2006

I listened with dread yesterday morning when they announced on the radio that British Petroleum would be shutting down one of the largest oil fields in the country due to a problem with a corroded section of pipeline.  I have an hour commute everyday and the last year has seen our monthly fill-up bill basically triple so I wasn't happy, but the radio report made it seem like a relative small and easily fixed problem.  Imagine my surprise when it was announced later in the day that BP was replacing 73% of its 22 mile pipeline at Prudhoe Bay

73%??  How do you get into a situation where "suddenly" you find out that three fourths of the pipeline you "oversee" is so corroded it has to be replaced?  Wouldn't regular maintenance or diagnotistics catch this sooner or was a decision made not to do anything until too late?   

(via The LeftCoaster)

(Update 8/8/06): If you needed any more bad news about how badly managed BP's Alaska operations are, check out this report from last week about how the DOT demanded BP's safety and maintenance logs after reports of numerous pipeline leaks.  No doubt this and an ongoing EPA and DOJ investigation helped prompt BP to finally do something but it doesn't say much for the folks Congressional Republicans want to turn ANWR over to does it?

RM
Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:30:44 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Monday, August 07, 2006

So much for listening to the commanders on the ground in Iraq?  Its especially refreshing to know that the President thinks events in that country have gone into some sorta weird stasis where nothing much has happened since the people there voted in the last elections.  I guess the fact that they did vote somehow prevents the unthinkable, kinda like when the United States dodged a bullet in the 1860 election?

RM
Monday, August 07, 2006 10:40:46 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Friday, August 04, 2006
RW
Friday, August 04, 2006 6:38:48 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, August 03, 2006

Another hilarious piece from the Onion!  Anybody else notice we've gotten to the point that parody news seems so much more insightful and useful then what passes for the mainstream media?

RM
Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:45:14 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Wow, Chris Matthews, shades of 2002-- where the hell did this come from?  Need to go after the liberal New York Democrat so blame Clinton for 9/11 and the first World Trade Center bombing?

I would like to point out to Chris that if Bush isn't at fault for 9/11 but gets kudos that there hasn't been another attack in the last four years, then Bill's off the hook for the first World Trade Center attack: because it happened only one month into his first term.  I'm sure that won't matter much to someone left so unhinged by the former President's political survival during the 90's but how pathetic...

RM
Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:30:01 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback