Wednesday, August 09, 2006

I think Simon Rosenberg offers a pretty compelling list of 3 things Joe Lieberman did wrong over the last year that pretty much cost him the Democratic nomination last night and oddly enough none of them have anything to do with the power of the "netroots" or the blight of "blogofacism".

RM
Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:29:23 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback

John Aravosis at AmericaBlog takes a pin and punctures the latest Republican meme that Ned Lamont's victory means a takeover of the Democratic party by the loony liberal left-wing of the Party (whatever that is...) by pointing out that if we are to believe that then certainly someone as left and conspiracy minded as incumbent Cynthia McKinney should have won her run-off election going away.  The fact that she lost badly and the DCCC left little doubt it wanted her gone among other fine examples kinda muddies what you're going to hear every RNC and Republican elected official, as well as the mainstream and conservative media establishment, whip like a dead horse for the next two months, but keep it in mind nonetheless. 

RM
Thursday, August 10, 2006 1:03:59 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

The Democratic Party has lost its SOULLLLLLL!

Joe, who? Nothing to see here, move along....

Okay, we're talking about a relatively unknown moderate Republican from Michigan and a former Democratic Vice-Presidential candidate who gets more Sunday morning face time than the leadership of his own Party ( which now I guess is truly "his own" Party) but pretty much the same story: two incumbent politicians out of step with their constituents and Party who get booted.  Ned Lamont doesn't have to apologize for knocking off Joe Lieberman any more than Al D'Amato did for ending Jacob Javits career or Lloyd Bentsen did for ending Ralph Yarborough's career...yes, this sort of thing has happened before even the "netroots" and somehow the Republic, as well as the Republican and Democratic Parties, did survive.

(Updated 8/9/06:12:21pm)

RM
Wednesday, August 09, 2006 7:53:06 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, August 08, 2006

I listened with dread yesterday morning when they announced on the radio that British Petroleum would be shutting down one of the largest oil fields in the country due to a problem with a corroded section of pipeline.  I have an hour commute everyday and the last year has seen our monthly fill-up bill basically triple so I wasn't happy, but the radio report made it seem like a relative small and easily fixed problem.  Imagine my surprise when it was announced later in the day that BP was replacing 73% of its 22 mile pipeline at Prudhoe Bay

73%??  How do you get into a situation where "suddenly" you find out that three fourths of the pipeline you "oversee" is so corroded it has to be replaced?  Wouldn't regular maintenance or diagnotistics catch this sooner or was a decision made not to do anything until too late?   

(via The LeftCoaster)

(Update 8/8/06): If you needed any more bad news about how badly managed BP's Alaska operations are, check out this report from last week about how the DOT demanded BP's safety and maintenance logs after reports of numerous pipeline leaks.  No doubt this and an ongoing EPA and DOJ investigation helped prompt BP to finally do something but it doesn't say much for the folks Congressional Republicans want to turn ANWR over to does it?

RM
Tuesday, August 08, 2006 7:30:44 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Monday, August 07, 2006

So much for listening to the commanders on the ground in Iraq?  Its especially refreshing to know that the President thinks events in that country have gone into some sorta weird stasis where nothing much has happened since the people there voted in the last elections.  I guess the fact that they did vote somehow prevents the unthinkable, kinda like when the United States dodged a bullet in the 1860 election?

RM
Monday, August 07, 2006 10:40:46 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Friday, August 04, 2006
RW
Friday, August 04, 2006 6:38:48 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, August 03, 2006

Another hilarious piece from the Onion!  Anybody else notice we've gotten to the point that parody news seems so much more insightful and useful then what passes for the mainstream media?

RM
Thursday, August 03, 2006 7:45:14 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Wow, Chris Matthews, shades of 2002-- where the hell did this come from?  Need to go after the liberal New York Democrat so blame Clinton for 9/11 and the first World Trade Center bombing?

I would like to point out to Chris that if Bush isn't at fault for 9/11 but gets kudos that there hasn't been another attack in the last four years, then Bill's off the hook for the first World Trade Center attack: because it happened only one month into his first term.  I'm sure that won't matter much to someone left so unhinged by the former President's political survival during the 90's but how pathetic...

RM
Thursday, August 03, 2006 12:30:01 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, August 01, 2006

Eric Umansky directs our attention to an LA Times photo of Israeli soldiers standing around a number of dead bodies covered in sheets that they claim are Hezbollah fighters, but for some reason, they've transported them from southern Lebanon to Israel?  Either Umansky's right and these bodies might be used in future exchanges of dead and wounded or we have the equivalent of Iraqi insurgents being put into boxes and sent to Dover Air Force base, and we know that doesn't happen, does it?

RM
Wednesday, August 02, 2006 1:13:03 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  |  Trackback

OUTRAGE...The Florida Republican Party is trying to tell Katherine Harris, much beloved heroine of the 2000 Florida recount, to end her Senate bid.  Oh, why can't they just give her an up or down vote in the Republican primary, huh? 

RM
Wednesday, August 02, 2006 12:34:02 AM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback

Fidel Castro's suddenly ceding power to his brother while apparently undergoing medical treatment should remind us that we, the United States, really need to face the fact that we haven't done enough to be in a position to constructively engage a post-Castro Cuba.  This neglect has been bipartisan and whether tied to appealing to the Cuban immigrant vote or the embarrassment of being unable to eliminate Castro during the Cold War it brings us no closer to promoting a democratic transition in Cuba. 

This CNN piece gives you an idea of where we're at and while its good that the State Department has a group and a point man devoted to democratic transition in Cuba, I may be reading this wrong but essentially we assume that when Castro dies, suddenly Cuba will open up, bygones will be bygones, the Cuban people will be singing our praises and Americans carrying big suitcases with money will start showing up and rebuild everything for only a couple hundred million dollars, or so?  Sounds like the kinda planning that made Iraq such a success.  In fact it reminds me a little of an old interview with Jorge Mas Canosa a few years before he died where it was suggested that once Castro was gone, it was a only a matter of Mas and his Cuban American National Foundation buddies stepping off the boat and taking the reigns of government.  Woof...

Update (8/1/06): Heather Hurlbut over at Democracy Arsenal provides us with a link to the latest report from the Commission for Assistance to a Free Cuba with some  thoughts on the more dubious aspects of their analysis.  Bottom line: This is the crew that was instrumental not only in toughening sanctions and meaningful diplomatic contact between the two countries but making it harder for Cuban Americans to see and help families still on the island yet they see few obstacles to a new Cuban government quickly seeking U.S. help when Castro's gone.  Your tax dollars at work...

RM
Tuesday, August 01, 2006 9:09:14 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Friday, July 28, 2006
RW
Friday, July 28, 2006 9:41:16 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

In an otherwise interesting poll on the GOP's electoral woes, one which showed a 13-point swing for Democrats in the top 50 House races, we find this little gem:

"I believe the tax breaks that Republicans give, even though I didn't benefit much by them, I believe the country did."

That's our problem in a nutshell.

RW
Friday, July 28, 2006 9:38:20 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback