Wednesday, January 18, 2006

Watching the disastrous roll-out of the new Medicare prescription drug plan kinda makes me wonder  how badly the Bush folks would mess up Social Security if given the chance. Uff da!

RM
Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:28:43 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [5]  |  Trackback
RW
Wednesday, January 18, 2006 10:13:14 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Monday, January 16, 2006
RW
Monday, January 16, 2006 2:28:08 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [3]  |  Trackback
 Thursday, January 12, 2006

Any of you labor lawyers out there know what the Special Assistant for Conservative Outreach at the Labor Department does?

RM
Friday, January 13, 2006 1:42:47 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  |  Trackback

I had heard brief reports about companies selling private cell phone records to just about anyone willing to pay money for them but I don't think it really hit home until John Aravosis publicized his purchase of Gen. Wesley Clark's cell phone records.  I know that corporations have been buying and selling personal information for years but how the hell is this legal?

RM
Friday, January 13, 2006 12:06:59 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [8]  |  Trackback
RM
Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:52:29 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

This piece by Mickey Kaus would make sense if he'd never read an Adam Nagourney article in his life, however since I don't think that's the case I'm lead to believe he's just making shit up for the hell of it. 

Nagourney article headlines look more like this short list from the last presidential campaign; see anything approaching Mickey's "GOP always on the ropes" theme?  Me neither.  Besides perhaps this one article, can anyone point to a Nagourney article where Democrats aren't politically inept, divided and totally without hope of ever winning the White House or Congress?   

I think I'm beginning to understand why James Wolcott labeled Kaus the classic example of a "counterintuitive" pundit

RM
Thursday, January 12, 2006 8:31:58 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback

William Jefferson of Louisiana.  Although not a part of the gigantic "culture of corruption" that is the K Street machine under DeLay and Abramoff, there is no doubt that corruption comes in all shapes, sizes and party affiliations.  Let's see if there's a difference here in the way each party handles the fallout.  Expect Jefferson to resign in a week.

RW
Thursday, January 12, 2006 5:46:16 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback
 Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Now if we can get the Army to spring for a retractable dome over this town they might be able to stop mortar and rocket attacks, too.

RM
Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:19:58 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Before you get too caught up in how Newt Gingrich has become the public face of Republicans urging ethics reform in Congress and nostalgic musings of how the glory days of the 1994 Republican revolution have been overshadowed by scandal, one need only look at Digby's rundown of Newt's own ethically challenged reign as Speaker to understand that this all didn't just start with Tom Delay and Newt "The Ends Justify the Means" Gingrich really doesn't have a lot of credibility on the issue.

RM
Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:08:49 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  |  Trackback
 Monday, January 09, 2006

Think Progress brings us this video of Tom Delay's ironic description of the wide ranging and brutal partisan conspiracy to deprive him of his leadership post.  As told by Mr. Delay that conspiracy includes 8, yes 8, separate grand juries.  Absolutely insidious!  I wonder where this plot goes next?

RM
Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:47:24 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

Conventional wisdom is that because some indian tribes who were represented by Jack Abramoff gave money to a few Democrats, it was Jack Abramoff who directed those contributions.  But is there any evidence whatsoever for this?  Check out the exchange between Governor Dean and Wolf Blitzer from CNN yesterday:

BLITZER: Should Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, who has now pleaded guilty to bribery charges, among other charges, a Republican lobbyist in Washington, should the Democrat who took money from him give that money to charity or give it back?

DEAN: There are no Democrats who took money from Jack Abramoff, not one, not one single Democrat. Every person named in this scandal is a Republican. Every person under investigation is a Republican. Every person indicted is a Republican. This is a Republican finance scandal. There is no evidence that Jack Abramoff ever gave any Democrat any money. And we've looked through all of those FEC reports to make sure that's true.

BLITZER: But through various Abramoff-related organizations and outfits, a bunch of Democrats did take money that presumably originated with Jack Abramoff.

DEAN: That's not true either. There's no evidence for that either. There is no evidence...

BLITZER: What about Senator Byron Dorgan?

DEAN: Senator Byron Dorgan and some others took money from Indian tribes. They're not agents of Jack Abramoff. There's no evidence that I've seen that Jack Abramoff directed any contributions to Democrats. I know the Republican National Committee would like to get the Democrats involved in this. They're scared. They should be scared. They haven't told the truth. They have misled the American people. And now it appears they're stealing from Indian tribes. The Democrats are not involved in this.

The contributions to Republicans that are drawing scrutiny from prosecutors are known to have been directed by Abramoff because he E-mailed everyone under the sun to make sure they've occured.  But I have yet to see a single instance of Jack Abramoff telling a tribe to contribute to a Democrat.  If anyone does have evidence of Abramoff directing a contribution by a tribe to a Democrat, please put the link to it in the comments.

RW
Monday, January 09, 2006 9:34:58 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [4]  |  Trackback

Looks like the White House had a lot of dealings with this guy, too.

RM
Monday, January 09, 2006 8:39:52 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

News Flash:  White House going out of its way to distance President from man most responsible for shoving his agenda through Congress.  No word yet on whether Mr. Delay will be scrubbed out of official White House photographs.

RM
Monday, January 09, 2006 8:35:09 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |  Trackback

Way ahead:

   Sanders:   75%
   Tarrant:    25%
   Undecided:04%

   Sanders:   75%
   Parke:      24%
   Undecided:04%

If the Republicans can only capture that 4% undecided they will lose by less than 50%.  Get crackin' boys!

 

RW
Monday, January 09, 2006 7:52:31 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
 Saturday, January 07, 2006
 Friday, January 06, 2006

Laura Rozen found this tidbit about Denny Hastert making House Republicans go through a course on ethics rules and their instructor is....the infamous Rep. Bob Ney.

RM
Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:30:52 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  |  Trackback

Let me get this straight, the President had a meeting with most of the Secretaries of State and Defense going back to the Kennedy administration billed as an opportunity to get some constructive advice and then only allows 5 to 10 minutes for discussion?  What was the point?  Forty minutes of a rah-rah presentation, a few minutes for Madeline Albright to tear him a new asshole and then let's all line up for a photograph.

RM
Friday, January 06, 2006 7:59:23 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [2]  |  Trackback