Thursday, February 21, 2008
« Mr. 19% | Main | America Wither? »

I find it very difficult to believe that the Times would have put their chin so far out on this story if they didn't know a lot more than they felt they could put in the article, at least on the first go.

Could McCain have gotten this far without vetting?

Looks like it.

This hurts Hillary if it drags out for more than two days. She wants scrutiny on Obama, not McCain.

RW
Thursday, February 21, 2008 10:24:36 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]  |  Trackback
Related Posts:
Silda Wall Spitzer's
Burning the Village to Save It
America Wither?
Mr. 19%
Maximum General
The Beginning of the End

Saturday, February 23, 2008 4:51:13 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I really enjoy reading your blog, it always has great insight. But I am very frustrated with the media’s lack of questions to the presidential candidates about global warming. Now that it is down to just a few candidates I would think that this would be a bigger issue.

Live Earth just picked up this topic and put out an article ( http://www.liveearth.org/news.php ) asking why the presidential candidates are not being solicited for their stance on the issue of the climate change. I just saw an article describing each candidate’s stance on global warming and climate change on earthlab.com http://www.earthlab.com/articles/PresidentialCandidates.aspx . So obviously they care about it. Is it the Medias fault for not asking the right questions or is it the candidates’ fault for not highlighting the right platforms? Does anyone know of other websites or articles that touch on this subject and candidates’ views? This is the biggest problem of the century and for generations to come…you would think the next president of the United States would be more vocal about it.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):