Friday, February 24, 2006
« Help Me Out | Main | My Answer to Laura »

The Bush Administration's priorities are on full display with the Ports scandal:

Do the terrorists win when we attack the wrong country enraging Arab opinion?  No.

Do the terrorists win when we hold prisoners in an area where our own laws do not reach?  No.

Do the terrorists win when we circumvent our own laws in order to conduct illegal spying on Americans?  No.

Do the terrorists win when we torture our prisoners?  No.

Do the terrorists win when we illegally seize suspects in other countries, hold them in former gulags and then send them off to other nations to be tortured?  No.

Do the terrorists win when people complain about a sweetheart deal to run the ports of the U.S., given to a company owned by a country which has ties to bin Laden, which does not recognize the state of Israel, and whose record on stopping smuggling and terrorist operations in their own port is terrible?  Apparently, yes:

Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England told the Senate Armed Services Committee that blocking the deal could ostracize one of the United States' few Arab allies. "The terrorists want our nation to become distrustful," England said. "They want us to become paranoid and isolationist, and my view is we cannot allow this to happen. It needs to be just the opposite."

After everything this Administration has done to make the American people be scared to death of terrorism from the Middle East, the statement is laughable.

RW
Friday, February 24, 2006 10:21:34 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
you will be afraid when POTUS (or duly designated minion) tells you to be afraid.
you will feel secure when POTUS (oddm) tells you to feel secure.
the terrorists will win when POTUS (oddm) presents a scenario in which it is rhetorically important that it seem as though terrorists will win.

but let's be a little reasonable about this ports management and the dubai based holding company: this was a rubber stamp deal for Interior that never would have come to POTUS' attention (due to a well-established line of duly designated minions) but for the apparent double standard. If it hadn't been Dubai, we'd never have heard about the foreign companies that routinely provide port services, like, for example, the British seller.

And doublestandards? Lets talk about the new-queue-ler club.

On the other hand, if we ever want this POTUS mitigated, it seems we'll have to have an incendiary and essentially jingoistically motivated issue like this that his erstwhile cronies, henchpersons and supporters can get behind. "dirty dirty arabs making our ports unsafe" seems more likely than The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, which, for one brief shining moment earlier this year, seemed like it might be the issue. Nope: swarthy, unreliable untermenschen.

Nice post.
ali
Friday, February 24, 2006 10:30:28 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)
I watched Leno the night this story really broke. He attacked Bush using almost every single code word for "Arab" which would get Bush's base against him. It was chilling, and I can't imagine that Bruce Bartlett felt good at all about it.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):