Thursday, April 07, 2005
« Reading Between The Lines | Main | I Post Comments »

Yesterday, I wondered aloud about comments made in the Washington Times regarding the "Schiavo Memo."  Seems that I was right to look closely at the statements made by Robert Traynham,  spokesman for Republican Conference Chairman Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania.  I noted that his denial involved a very interesting parsing of the levels of staff who were not involved.

Turns out that a senior staffer for Senator Mel Martinez, an attorney no less, drafted the "Schiavo Memo" and that Mel himself "unbeknownst to me" had handed it out to Tom Harkin, Democratic senator from Iowa.

Predictably, the Powerline boys are spinning it just as my post yesterday anticipated they would.  See, it was a low level renegade staffer not Mel "Unbeknownst to Me" Martinez who was responsible.  Their new angle?  Why its all the fault of the "MSM" for misreporting the story as "Republican Leaders" distributing the memo.  But boys, a "Republican Senator" did distribute the memo.  Not only that, but Powerline's entire theory is based on the idea that everything coming out of Mel "Unbeknownst to Me" Martinez regarding the memo is the truth.  Yesterday, however, Mel denied being the source of the memo:

"Senator Martinez has never seen the memo and condemns its sentiments," spokeswoman Kerry Feehery said. "No one in our office has seen it, nor had anything to do with its creation.

Powerline's argument thus rests on very thin spring Minnesota ice.

I think a more likely reconstruction of the story is this:  Over the weekend, the sourcing of the memo was traced to Martinez's office.  The Republican Senate leadership, helped along by our favorite wingnut bloggers around Blogistan planted the "Is the Memo A Fake" story at the Washington Times to begin the job of damage control, based on the idea that "no Republican would ever do this."   Helps make the "unbeknownst to me" story go down easier. 

At the end, what do we have?  Two weeks of lies, Powerline boys desparately spinning "Crass Political Memo" into "MSM Misreported the Story" and Mel "Unbeknownst to Me" Martinez with a new nickname.

RW
Thursday, April 07, 2005 8:57:32 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Powerline aside, Republican "leaders" didn't draft the memo, it wasn't Republican party policy and Martinez should apologize for passing it out without some kind of reference to authorship. You can see the mention of Nelson was related to Martinez...this was just a talking points memo to the boss from a staffer. Doesn't make it right, doesn't make it less embarrassing, but it was not a Republican Party document and does not reflect the leadership's position on the matter.
Thursday, April 07, 2005 9:31:03 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Why believe Martinez? Its a lie, of course. He's done this before--with his Republican opponent in the primary, with his Democratic opponent in the general election--and lo and behold, every time it happens, gee it was a staffer, or a group outside of the campaign etc. After a while its a little unbelievable.

Don't believe me? Try the St. Petersburg Times Nov. 4, 2004 post-election editorial:

But Martinez will need more than a gesture to separate his office from the ugliness and excesses of his campaign.

Long after leaving Republicans embittered by his appeals to bigotry and his vulgar attacks on former U.S. Rep. Bill McCollum, Martinez used his general election campaign to tar Castor, a distinguished former legislator and education leader, as a terrorist sympathizer.

When challenged, Martinez was too eager to assign blame to his staff or to groups he said he couldn't control. As a senator, he will need an office and a staff that speaks with the measured and centrist tone he says will be his own. He can't pretend to be above it all if the people he employs are not.

That can be found at http://www.sptimes.com/2004/11/04/Opinion/The_real_Mel_Martinez.shtml

The faster the Republicans get rid of these clowns, the better.
Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:39:26 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
There's even more hijinks--how about this puppy "The Martinez strategy: Fewer issues, more dirt," Jim Defede, Miami Herald, 10/3/04
See Defede's imaginary conversation:
In the hotly contested race for U.S. Senate, candidate Mel Martinez has stayed on the offensive, first against fellow Republican Bill McCollum and now against Democratic nominee Betty Castor. Since we expect more of the same in the final weeks leading to the Nov. 2 showdown, the following is how I imagine next week's strategy session will go between Martinez and his campaign staff.

Martinez: Good afternoon everyone. Where are we?

Staffer No. 1: Well, the polls are still very close. It's a dead heat between you and Betty Castor.

Martinez: OK, any ideas?

Staffer No. 2: We could try debating her on the issues.

Martinez: Issues! Are you crazy? No, what we need to do is slime her just like we did Bill McCollum in the primary.

Staffer No. 1: Are you sure you want to go negative, sir?

Martinez: Oh, I'm not going to go negative. You guys are. This week, Danny and Tom will issue statements suggesting the reason Castor supports stem cell research is because she has been diagnosed with Alzheimer's and that she is mentally incompetent to be a senator.

Staffer No. 2: Is that true, sir? Does she have Alzheimer's?

Martinez: Of course not. But once you guys say it, some nitwit's going to believe it. And if the media goes nuts and blasts us for being insensitive, I'll step in, act disgusted by your assertions and repudiate you as a couple of ''young turks.'' But even after I distance myself from your remarks, some people will still believe Castor is sick. This is going to be great.

Staffer No. 1: I'm sorry, sir. There is only one problem. You can't call Danny and Tom ''young turks'' because you already called Pete and Bobby ''young turks'' after you had them accuse McCollum of being in bed with the "radical homosexual lobby.''

Martinez: Darn it! [Pause in conversation. Martinez can be heard talking to himself.] Think, Mel, think. I got it! We'll call them overzealous.

Staffer No. 1: Nope. We used that one for the guys at the ad agency that produced the commercial labeling McCollum "antifamily.''

Martinez: OK, how about rogue staffers? You guys wouldn't mind being rogue staffers would you?

Staffer No. 1: No, sorry sir, you called Carlos and Hector rogue staffers after they issued that news release you wrote for the Spanish-language radio stations calling the federal agents who seized Elián González "armed thugs.''

Martinez: Well-intentioned but misguided?

Staffer No. 2: That's what you said about Sandy and Diane after they said Castor was an accomplished thespian in college.

Martinez: Renegade? I don't remember condemning anyone on my staff for being a renegade.

Staffer No. 1: Well, we were saving renegade for the commercials suggesting Castor may have been a founding member of al Qaeda.

Martinez: [Sounding annoyed.] Look people, I can't do this on my own. I need your help. I realize none of you like being repudiated. Do you think I like repudiating you? I don't. But I made it very clear from the beginning that this campaign was going to be based on one simple theme: plausible deniability. I can't get elected if people are going to hold me accountable for the mean and nasty things we're doing. My only hope is to blame each and every one of you.

Staffer No. 2: You're right, sir. And, I think I speak for everyone in this room when I say we are all honored to be the kindling in the bonfire of your vanity.

Martinez: OK, I have no idea what you just said. Sounds like homosexualist talk to me, but nevertheless if it was an apology, I accept it. Now let's get back to the hard work of this campaign. Remember, the mud isn't going to sling itself people. In the meantime, get me a thesaurus because for the next 30 days I'm going to repudiate each and every one of you like my life depended on it.

The guy is dirt. He knew exactly what was going on. You guys are going continue to be burned by this stuff until you start telling truth to the American people. There's a reason Gallup has Congressional approval rates at 39% and Bush at 45%. Nobody really trusts them.
Friday, April 08, 2005 7:33:51 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
"You guys are going continue to be burned by this stuff until you start telling truth to the American people."

And Kennedy, Boxer, et al never lie to the American people? I think we're all getting burned.
Friday, April 08, 2005 8:48:42 PM (GMT Daylight Time, UTC+01:00)
Accept the truth. Your guy is lying. He tried a dirty trick and got caught for the fourth time in a row. Dumb. Where is Boxer or Kennedy lying? Let's see a real-life example.
Name
E-mail
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):